
At yesterdays budget meeting councilors were in an all day Saturday marathon of budget meetings with a full slate of budget discussions that had us meeting from 8:30Am until 3:00pm.
At the end of the meeting, councilors came out with a reduction of only $21,000!or to translate a penny per $1000 of home value
I made a motion on 2 items that could of saved this town an additional $145,000 but it failed to gain support. The biggest problem was that these two items are not what I would call critical( must haves) in a budget year that is as tight as tight can be!
The first item was $62,000 for sidewalk construction from the Upperroom to Barkland Dr. While this project has merit, I would not say this is something that we must spend on to do this year. In fact, If this is the route that 4A will be taking, They may have to widened this road eventually and the sidewalk may have to be torn up and re-done. Also, If it were a sidewalk to be used for children walking to school, then I could see a critical need.
The second, is a road being proposed to be paved on Manning Street( not to be confused with the already established Manning street the next road over) between the courthouse and connecting to Rollins St directly across the Street from Hood Park. Again this is not critical and is in fact being used as "political payback". Why do I say this? Because some people believe that when I spoke up about this a few years back, they claimed that I was against this because it was in my back yard- You know the old NIMBY claim. NOT IN MY BACK YARD!. Well it simply was because neighbors had a complaint and ask for me to speak on the issue for them. And I did and I was successful in delaying this project.
By not doing this project this year-we could have a Savings of $ 80,000- This council choose to keep it alive with discussion to come later.
Now lets look at the issues on this subject. It was mentioned that by paving the Manning St it would help traffic flow for Trucks. It was then mentioned by Kevin Coyle that it would open up commercial land ( Bensons Lumber property ) This is his way of increasing commercial base?? It's already there! With a fence looking at a lumberyard.
Here is why I'm against it at least for now.
1) This part of the road was never officially laid-out by the planning board according to state law.
2) Bike path is designated in the exact same location
3) Railroad right-away runs smack down the middle of this road
4) Town's engineering company CLD did a traffic study on this and the study itself said that this project is a waste of money. In fact I challenged all councilors to do the research themselves and see this report. Will they take the recommendation ( I doubt it! ) because then the taxpayers will see what a waste this project is.
The study itself said that because the DMC is so close to the Londonderry line Most people traveling to the DMC come from the East and would not use this road to navigate. Some like Janet say to alleviate traffic from West Broadway ( Is she kidding) people use maple street already they are not using this to navigate from West Broadway it does not make sense.
5) This area is used by lots of kids and families as recreation and we have a tennis court that will be so close to the "new road" that tennis balls could come into traffic
6) Sight distance will make it very tricky for cars turning left or right from this new road-
Anyway, Wasting taxpayers money is a pet peeve of mine and you the taxpayers must know about these issues. So if you want to spend money for the two businesses that have trucks going to them so be it ( One company already send its fleet of trucks through to rollins every morning) the other company wants it for their trucks to have an easier time.
Don't get me wrong here. I do understand that I am one block from the downtown but to spend money on something paid engineers are saying is a waste is another thing.
What are your thoughts??